Dec 31, 2011

Commodities III - Chemicals

Natural gas prices are set to remain low due to the boom in shale gas extraction and the subdued economic growth (US Gov should start to tighten 1+% of GDP p.a. of its deficit after the elections. That could have an impact of up to 2% of GDP p.a.

Chemicals set to benefit from these low Natural Gas prices. US chem' firms have become the world's second cheapest producers Nitrogen fertilizers.

Ethanol demand will not decrease despite reduced subsidies. But if gasoline consumption would go down, ethanol would follow suite and corn with it (since it is the largest use of corn in the US.

Monsanto - MON at 70 usd
Mosaic - MOS at 50.4
Potash - POT at 41.3
Intrepid Potash - IPI at
CF Industries - CF
Agrium - AGU
Du Pont - DD



Commodities II - URanium

After Fukushima disaster on March 11, 2011, the nuclear sector has been battered by investors as increased regulatory risk and phase-out programmes from several countries (Germany, Switzerland, .... ) could pose a paradigm change in the generation mix of developed countries.
Emerging countries seem to be less concerned about tail-risks associated with nuclear plants (Hungary & Czech vs Austria & Germany).

The ETF for uranium miners, Global X Uranium, URA (closing 2011 at $ 8.1) has been among the worst performing ETFs in 2011. Nonetheless, 2012 and 2013 could be the years to see a come back of uranium, triggered by the destocking of the Russian military reserves and the c. 55 million lbs gap between supply and demand.
More info can be found in this article.

Uranium U3O8 has finished 2011 trading at $ 51.75 in the spot market (see graph). These levels are not much higher than the production costs and make the development of many projects unprofitable. Worldwide production is 130 m lbs, short of the ww demand of 180 / 190 m lbs required to fuel the 443 reactors currently in use; of which 104 are in the US; and 11 of will cease to operate as a consequence of political decisions taken in Germany and Japan sparked by the Fukushima accident.


If we combine these factors with the end of the Russian military stockpiles of HEU treatment carried out by Cameco, we can already envisage a much tighter uranium market in 2012 / 2013.

Furthermore, China, India, ... have .... reactors planned /
62 reactors are currently under construction.

The long-term demographic and economic (ie increased energy consumption) trends are supporters of high uranium demand in the future. And our expectation is that this demand will drive uranium prices significantly up, since the supply side is much more constrained.




Risks
... to the investment case could come from an increased momentum in the anti-nuclear policies, worse news-flow from Japan (e.g. EPA has closed down the US monitoring stations), and a long-term substitution trend towards Thorium -a byproduct in the processing of rare earth elements.

China, Japan and some other countries are increasing their efforts to develop nuclear energy using thorium because it is safer the mineral per se, and the reactors are also safer. Besides, it is x400 times more availability than Uranium.

... but even if there would a clear switch towards thorium, with 400+ operating plants the needs of uranium won't decrease, as reactors were made to last 40+ years, and some could be extended for as long as 100 years.


Gaining risk exposure
can be achieved via market-wide ETFs like Global X Uranium, URA ($8/sh) which owns established and mature producers like Cameco, Denison Mines but also junior producers like Fission (which has high grade -good quality- mines), Strathmore and / or Ur-Energy ($0.85/sh).

Most of these companies are based in the US or Canada, which reduces significantly the political / regulatory and economic risks.

Favorite picks:
Uranium Energy Corporation - UEC at $3.06/share; 231m; fwPE 15
Uranerz Energy - URZ at 1.82; 140m; fwPE 36
Ur-Energy - URG at 0.86; 89m
Uranium one - UUU, 3Q2011 webcast;
Cameco - CCJ at $18/share; 7.12bn; PE 15



known unkowns:
is the uranium market affected by the electricity prices?
... I am not an expert in this field, but I would assume that no, only in the very long run (ie 10+y).
My thesis is based on the lengthy construction process of a nuclear plant, and the no optionality in the degree of operations of a reactor (ie either they work at full capacity or they don't work). Therefore, I assume that the operations are not affected by the supply/demand of energy. ie, as long as they are in OK conditions, they will operate at full capacity, and therefore demand of uranium is very unelastic (at least in what concerns the energy prices).

Dec 29, 2011

Commodities I - PGMs
























Palladium price (dec 2011)














Platinum price: 1138.5 eur/troy ounce (dec 2011)















PGMs, especially palladium, seem to be an attractive asset to own in the medium to long term.

Platinum, palladium and rhodium are used primarily to coate the autocatalysts in order to reduce emissions. Technology improvements can increase the efficiency of the autcatalysts and reduce the loads of PGMs. On the other hand, more stringent regulation has compensated this factor.

The three precious metals are used to coat autocatalysts of gasoline engines, while only the former can be used for diesel engines.

The cheaper price of palladium may lure autocat manufacturers like Johnson Matthey and increase their loads of this metal at the expense of platinum. This strategy may narrow the price gap between the two metals and we could see palladium prices at 0.7 to 0.9 of those for platinum.

Rhodium is a byproduct of platinum. Used mostly for autocatalysts, catalysts, and glass manufacturing. DeNOX (gasoline engines). Mined in SA

IRidium is also a byproduct, it's price has sky-rocketed due to its usage in tech gadgets.


These are some insightful comments from SWC's CFO, Greg Wing, about their acquisition of a copper and gold property, and about their view on PGMs, which has been their core area so far.


Hard Assets Investor: Why has copper held its price so well while other industrial metals seem to have taken a hit?

Wing: Well, if you were talking to my boss [CEO] Frank McAllister, he would say that copper is the fifth precious metal. But let me set that aside and say that I think my understanding of it links to the dynamics of the world economy.

If you went back to around 1900 and you looked at the intensity of copper use in the United States, you would see that it was rising very steeply at that point. And that intensity of use, say, per unit of GDP or something like that, was indicative of the fact that the United States was industrializing at that point. Copper demand had grown and was growing very significantly. And, by the way, if you looked at the price of copper in 1910 compared to today in real dollars, it was up around $8 a pound, up substantially from where it is now [about $4 a pound].

In the 1930s, you not only saw the Great Depression, but you also saw the completion of that major industrialization phase in the U.S. The intensity of copper use dropped off in the U.S. It came back, to some extent, during World War II. Following the war, you saw similar spikes in intensity of copper use in Japan and in Germany. That was the rebuilding of those economies.

And then prices fell off somewhere around 1970 and languished from the early 1970s until the early 2000s, about 2003. And all of a sudden, you see another major economy starting to emerge at that point. And that obviously is China, and, to a lesser extent, some other countries. Underlying the strength in the copper price is the fact that China is still very actively industrializing. There is a lot of demand for copper coming out of there.

The demand for copper is exceeding the supply and is probably on trend to do that for a while, or at least is tight against supply. Copper is looking good for the next decade or 15 years, maybe.

HAI: Let’s talk about platinum. What’s driving demand in platinum right now?

Wing: If you look at platinum — and this is true of palladium as well — there aren't very many places in the world where you produce significant quantities of platinum. South Africa produces probably 70 percent. Russia, as a byproduct, produces 20 to 25 percent. And the balance sort of comes out of companies like us. That’s just about it. So, on the supply side, there aren't huge tracts waiting to be developed. The cost curve drives platinum. In South Africa, the marginal producers are right up against the cost curve. On top of that, you’ve got the South African political scene, where people are talking about nationalization. It’s just really tough to make those investment decisions. And then you’ve got limited electricity and limitations on water. In effect, you’ve got platinum pretty well locked against the cost curve.

Obviously, palladium is the principal metal in gasoline catalytic converters. There still is a lot of platinum used in diesel catalytic converters, and a little more than 50 percent of European production is diesel. So that market is there.

The other growing application is in big on-road and off-road diesel applications, both stationary source and construction equipment, over-the-road diesels. So there’s some growth in demand there. And again, platinum supply isn't growing.

HAI: What is the recycling percentage a year of supply?

Wing: It’s probably about 1 million to 1.5 million ounces a year, on top of about 6 million ounces of native production.

HAI: So less than 20 percent?

Wing: That’s right. Others said they can see that going up to 2 to 2.5 million ounces over the next, well, let’s say five to 10 years. Hard to tell, exactly.

HAI: What about palladium?

Wing: Palladium is kind of a parallel story. The big producer, 50 percent or so of the market on palladium production is Norilsk Nickel of Russia. They produce it as a byproduct of nickel. The South Africans produce it as a byproduct of platinum. And obviously we produce it, and North American Palladium produces it, and, to a limited extent, the nickel producers in Canada produce some of it as a byproduct. And again, that’s about it, other than recycling.

The Russian angle to palladium isn’t discussed much. When Norilsk Nickel started large-scale production, which would have been around 1940-41, they also produced palladium as a byproduct. But in those days, there wasn’t really any market for palladium. So they stockpiled it until the fall of the Soviet Union. And estimates, at that point, had about 30 million ounces of palladium sitting in that stockpile.

When the Soviet Union became the Russian Federation and opened up to a freer market structure, the government began gradually selling off that inventory. They never quite said publicly how much is in that inventory. But just kind of working backwards, we’ve estimated that it’s somewhere between 25 and 35 million ounces. Since those sales began, about 30 million ounces have come out. Not much has come out in the last 18 months to two years.

There have been statements by Norilsk and by Russian Finance Ministry officials without attribution that that resource is about gone. The Russian agency that’s responsible for those sales came out earlier this year and said, “We are going to be selling some in 2012 as well.” But they also commented that, to do that, they would be reprocessing to get it up to quality.

Also, China is becoming key to the palladium story. Obviously, at the end of 2008, you saw worldwide auto production fall off fairly steeply. It’s been gradually recovering. In 2010, it was — on a worldwide basis — at record levels: somewhere around 75 million vehicles produced. And the big growth is not in the U.S. or America and Western Europe, it’s China. China is now the largest-producing and the largest-consuming country of vehicles in the world.

HAI: Does China have the same requirements for catalytic converters as the U.S.?

Wing: The requirements are a little bit lighter. But all vehicles produced there have to have catalytic converters. The engines probably, on average, are a little bit smaller. The requirement for platinum and palladium is a little bit lower, and in particular, palladium, because they're mostly gasoline catalytic converters. But again, the projections are that by 2015, we could be producing 100 million vehicles in the world; a one-third increase over where it is today. And obviously, that dynamic suggests that, against limited supply, price is attractive over time. I would quickly add that we think those underlying long-term dynamics are significant. But that’s not to say there won't be cycles in the price superimposed on top of that supply/demand dynamic.

HAI: What do you think of this new catalytic converter that uses gold?

Wing: Well, to the extent that technology is available to study, we’ve looked at it. It looks like it primarily is displacing a certain amount of platinum. At today’s prices, with gold right sort of neck-and-neck with platinum, I'm not sure there’s a whole lot of economic advantage to it. It doesn’t do very much to palladium, at least as we understand it. It’s mostly the platinum that it affects. And the platinum in gasoline catalytic converters is a pretty small component. It would be less than 5 percent.



With the acquisition of the copper and gold property, SWC ceases to be a pure play on PGMs.
Needless to say, the move has not been received cheerfully by the investment community. Here their arguments:

Hard Assets Investor: Why did Stillwater buy Peregrine Metals?

Greg Wing: There are several reasons. We have been concerned about the fact that we are not particularly diversified; that is, we specialize in platinum and palladium. And those are wonderful products to specialize in, but they’re also somewhat cyclical. And if you look back over the last decade or so, there have been about three occasions where the price of palladium, in particular, has cratered.


Elsewhere, platinum production in South Africa is subsidised via lower energy prices (which are even below generation costs).

There are also several macro headwinds
Mr. Savouri mentions several here in his interview in reuters

Toscafund sees South Africa "blow-up" in 15 years
* Consequences more serious than Libya
* Cites emigration, government failure to tackle problems
* Higher commodity prices to benefit Russia, Australia

And here, 'South Africa's election battle vs. markets', by Sid Verma, FT Tilt

Here the 2011 bloomberg ranking of analysts.