Feb 22, 2012

SRI - Social Responsible Investing

Topics of Interest:


- Nocera's artificial photosynthesis
... and how chemical fuels could not only substitute oil and gas (e.g. for transportation purposes), but go further and supply energy in scattered geographies like ElectroPS.it is doing in Asia and Africa.

- Fracking Could Work If Industry Would Come Clean
Companies like Baker Hughes and Schlumberger are developing technology to overcome many of the current problems mentioned.

It is quite certain that gas will be a game changer, and therefore substituting coal by gas seems like a good idea. But SWITCHING FROM COAL TO NATURAL GAS WOULD DO LITTLE FOR GLOBAL CLIMATE, STUDY INDICATES. Where they note that methane leakages have stronger greenhouse effects than CO2. Furthermore:

- Climate change may not be that related to CO2 emissions --but rather, to solar activity. Hence, carbon sequestration may not be a technology worth developing.


- Quantum physics could help minimize energy consumption by electronic devices. NYT reports that Physicists Create a Working Transistor From a Single Atom

- Examples of efficient buildings from p.70.
Which companies would benefit the most from the potential growth in this area? Schneider, GE, Sylvania?


More to come.
In the meantime, keep wired (to) Watts Up With That?
Boing Boing, Wired Science, Women in Planetary Science, David Robertson.

Feb 8, 2012

Meeting with Sven de Causmaecker

Meeting with Sven de Causmaecker in KL, Malaysia.
He is a graduate in Chemistry from Germany.
We chatted about possible breakthrough technologies within the renewable energies world.

He talked about Daniel Nocera, a Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor whose recent research focuses on solar-powered fuels.

2 H2O >> 2H2 + O2
Hydrogen, used as a chemical fuel, has much higher storage capacity than the lithium batteries (there is not enough lithium for widespread transportation usage. H2 has also zero emissions; and the chemical reaction can be reversed with sun power at relatively high levels of efficiency.

There are several interesting videos of this technology in youtube. I would highlight his lecture in the Brookhaven Science Associates titled "Harnessing Energy from the Sun for Six Billion People -- One at a Time."


Oil is a very efficient form to store energy because its chemical union has little mass: Carbon - electron - Carbon, while for Lithium, the lightest metal, the density of energy that you can store is much lower. The nuclei are very light in atomic weight. But it is less common than 25 of the 32 chemical elements.

Uranium: 20 Terajoules/kg
Hidrogen condensed at 700 bar): 123 MJ/kg
Gasoline & Diesel: 47.2 & 45.4 MJ/kg
Fats / Carboydrates / Proteins: 37 / 17 / 16.8
Lithium air battery: 9
Lthium battery: 1.3
Lithium-ion battery: 720 kJ/kg.


Sven also mentioned cyano-biofuels, a small biotech firm based in Berlin, born from the university entrepreneurial lab of the German university of xxx, doing research on
cyanobacteria and how to obtain cheap ethanol from algae and CO2.


We also talked about other technologies other than sun, which are clearly insufficient to meet the energy demands of the global population for the next decades.

[Current population: 7bn people. Energy consumption: 14TW.
Exp. population in 2050: 9bn people. Exp. energy demand in 2050: from 30 to 50TW]

Wind (farms) could yield up to 3TW of energy, which falls much short of demand growth. Onshore wind is the cheapest of the renewable energies. It is already pretty developed, with most of the best areas in many countries already exploited. Furthermore, aesthetic considerations will probably curb future development (as WT are growing bigger and taller, and therefore they can be seen from larger distances.

Fernan, working in SG for Gamesa pointed out that for strong winds it is better to have a high density net of smaller WT. While for milder winds it is better to have fewer but bigger WT.

Sven also said that offshore wind farms provoke vibrations that affect the bio-diversity of the area. Although few decision-makers will care about it.
Onshore WT also have collateral damage for the biologic fauna: they kill birds.

Offshore wind farms slightly lowers the load factor in the onshore wind farms. As you harvest the wind in the sea, the load factors inland will be reduced because the total quantity of wind energy generated by the sun is limited.

Peter Gleick is a PhD from UC Berkeley. His area of research is centered around freshwater.

All-Europe Equity Research Teams

Participants in the 2012 All-Europe Research Team were asked to rate, on a scale of 1 to 10, the importance they attach to a dozen sell-side equity research attributes. Industry knowledge receives the highest rating, followed by integrity/professionalism; accessibility/responsiveness and local market knowledge/country knowledge tie for third. Earnings estimates is deemed the least important of the attributes.

2012's ranking:
DB 117, BAML 77, UBS 52, MS 49, JPM 54, Citi 30, CS 25, Barcap 17, Stanford C. Bernstein 32, Exane 15, Nomura 10, RBS 4, CA 10, SG 3, Kempen 4, GS 3, Redburn Partners 3, Goodbody 3, Handelsbanken CM 3, MainFirst Bank 3, Rabobank 4, Davy 4, Santander 4, SEB 4, Equita S.I.M. 3.


2011's ranking:
DB 74, UBS 77, BAML 56, CS 49, MS 47,
JPM 58, Citi 17, CS 49, Barcap 20, Stanford C. Bernstein 37, Exane 11, Nomura 31, RBS 6, CA 6, SG 5, GS 4, Kempen 2.


Jan 1, 2012

Musing on 2012

12 month performance chart from the FT macromap:


Looking ahead to 2012 and 2013, I think that equities and equity-like products will benefit from a lower equity risk premium once the European debt crisis stabilizes. Damodaran calculates it on a monthly basis, and according to his calculations -for which I would give full credit- it finished the year at 6.04% (up from 5.2% at the beginning of the year, but down from a max of 7.64% during the market jitters of the summer).

The improvement in the (attractiviness of) valuations has been supported by a good year for corporate america. With earnings up 16% for the year, and cash flows to investors (dividends and buybacks) yielding 5.9% -significantly higher than the 10y UST yield at 1.87%, but also higher than the 10 year average at 4.72%.

Treasuries had indeed a very good year. With returns above 16% for 2011 there is not much more upside potential. Higher economic growth or higher inflation expectations would drag the prices lower, to yields that would be more aligned with historical measures (like those for the end of 2010, above 3%).

This analysis, in combination with the exploration of the supply and demand prospects in some specific markets that have called my attention recently translantes into some more specific trading ideas:

Longs of early cyclical companies. Including:

- Soft commodities -potash and phosphates. I am an avid reader of Jeremy Grantham's publications; and I think he is right in his call about the increasing scarcity of soil for feeding an ever increasing global population. The “finiteness of natural resources is simply ignored, and pricing is based entirely on short-term supply and demand.
Therefore I like potassium and phosphorus, which are necessary for all life and cannot be artificially manufactured or substituted by other products.

- Hard commodities, especially
physical ownership of PGMs (rather than miners) via ETFs. i.e. Palladium and Platinum; and in a second order, Rhodium and Iridium.

- Energy-commodities like Uranium. Again, global energy demand is expected to double in the next two / three decades. Even after Fukushima's disaster, nuclear energy stands as one of the most reliable, cheaper and cleaner sources of energy in todays' world. Demand continues to be strong, outpacing global supply, and the depletion of the Russian nuclear reserves is coming to an end.

For uranium you may understand that the investor community is not interested in ownership of the physical asset -but rather, equity exposure through miners. After a very bad year in 2011 in which the sector was battered by investors, junior miners like Fission and Ur-Energy can yield better results (adjusted for risk, although it is the market who will determine that).

URA is the most popular ETF in the industry. Apparently it was the worse performer ETF in 2011; which was what initially called my attention ...

And lastly, digging a bit into the fundamentals of the companies; I like some metals and mining companies like BHP, automotive companies like Volkswagen, BMW and Hyundai motor; and Korean exporters like Samsung.


As said before, I would open shorts on AAA Sovereign bonds (US, UK, DE, JP). Yields are so low that they can only go high. And if they go lower ... what? At these levels there is not much room for higher bond prices and therefore losses are fairly limited. On the other hand, the downside potential (for the underlying prices, and therefore to make money) is much greater. Besides, since we are experiencing a collateral crunch, these assets are priced at a premium vs fundamentals. If I would have a bigger portfolio, not only I would not hold them, I would short them.

I am also quite bearish about the wind energy industry.
I think that there is still money to be made shorting Gamesa, Acciona, Vestas, EDPR (in this order).

Eq long/short spreads:
Long companies with no dividends, short companies with high dividends (since it seems that are priced at a premium up and above their supposed smaller risk exposure).

Long Hang Seng (from 2H2012), Strait Times, short Dow Jones
Long MXP, EUR, GBP, short JPY
I also like an assymetric bet in precious metals: short gold and silver and long palladium and platinum -physical rather than equities.

Dec 31, 2011

Commodities III - Chemicals

Natural gas prices are set to remain low due to the boom in shale gas extraction and the subdued economic growth (US Gov should start to tighten 1+% of GDP p.a. of its deficit after the elections. That could have an impact of up to 2% of GDP p.a.

Chemicals set to benefit from these low Natural Gas prices. US chem' firms have become the world's second cheapest producers Nitrogen fertilizers.

Ethanol demand will not decrease despite reduced subsidies. But if gasoline consumption would go down, ethanol would follow suite and corn with it (since it is the largest use of corn in the US.

Monsanto - MON at 70 usd
Mosaic - MOS at 50.4
Potash - POT at 41.3
Intrepid Potash - IPI at
CF Industries - CF
Agrium - AGU
Du Pont - DD



Commodities II - URanium

After Fukushima disaster on March 11, 2011, the nuclear sector has been battered by investors as increased regulatory risk and phase-out programmes from several countries (Germany, Switzerland, .... ) could pose a paradigm change in the generation mix of developed countries.
Emerging countries seem to be less concerned about tail-risks associated with nuclear plants (Hungary & Czech vs Austria & Germany).

The ETF for uranium miners, Global X Uranium, URA (closing 2011 at $ 8.1) has been among the worst performing ETFs in 2011. Nonetheless, 2012 and 2013 could be the years to see a come back of uranium, triggered by the destocking of the Russian military reserves and the c. 55 million lbs gap between supply and demand.
More info can be found in this article.

Uranium U3O8 has finished 2011 trading at $ 51.75 in the spot market (see graph). These levels are not much higher than the production costs and make the development of many projects unprofitable. Worldwide production is 130 m lbs, short of the ww demand of 180 / 190 m lbs required to fuel the 443 reactors currently in use; of which 104 are in the US; and 11 of will cease to operate as a consequence of political decisions taken in Germany and Japan sparked by the Fukushima accident.


If we combine these factors with the end of the Russian military stockpiles of HEU treatment carried out by Cameco, we can already envisage a much tighter uranium market in 2012 / 2013.

Furthermore, China, India, ... have .... reactors planned /
62 reactors are currently under construction.

The long-term demographic and economic (ie increased energy consumption) trends are supporters of high uranium demand in the future. And our expectation is that this demand will drive uranium prices significantly up, since the supply side is much more constrained.




Risks
... to the investment case could come from an increased momentum in the anti-nuclear policies, worse news-flow from Japan (e.g. EPA has closed down the US monitoring stations), and a long-term substitution trend towards Thorium -a byproduct in the processing of rare earth elements.

China, Japan and some other countries are increasing their efforts to develop nuclear energy using thorium because it is safer the mineral per se, and the reactors are also safer. Besides, it is x400 times more availability than Uranium.

... but even if there would a clear switch towards thorium, with 400+ operating plants the needs of uranium won't decrease, as reactors were made to last 40+ years, and some could be extended for as long as 100 years.


Gaining risk exposure
can be achieved via market-wide ETFs like Global X Uranium, URA ($8/sh) which owns established and mature producers like Cameco, Denison Mines but also junior producers like Fission (which has high grade -good quality- mines), Strathmore and / or Ur-Energy ($0.85/sh).

Most of these companies are based in the US or Canada, which reduces significantly the political / regulatory and economic risks.

Favorite picks:
Uranium Energy Corporation - UEC at $3.06/share; 231m; fwPE 15
Uranerz Energy - URZ at 1.82; 140m; fwPE 36
Ur-Energy - URG at 0.86; 89m
Uranium one - UUU, 3Q2011 webcast;
Cameco - CCJ at $18/share; 7.12bn; PE 15



known unkowns:
is the uranium market affected by the electricity prices?
... I am not an expert in this field, but I would assume that no, only in the very long run (ie 10+y).
My thesis is based on the lengthy construction process of a nuclear plant, and the no optionality in the degree of operations of a reactor (ie either they work at full capacity or they don't work). Therefore, I assume that the operations are not affected by the supply/demand of energy. ie, as long as they are in OK conditions, they will operate at full capacity, and therefore demand of uranium is very unelastic (at least in what concerns the energy prices).

Dec 29, 2011

Commodities I - PGMs
























Palladium price (dec 2011)














Platinum price: 1138.5 eur/troy ounce (dec 2011)















PGMs, especially palladium, seem to be an attractive asset to own in the medium to long term.

Platinum, palladium and rhodium are used primarily to coate the autocatalysts in order to reduce emissions. Technology improvements can increase the efficiency of the autcatalysts and reduce the loads of PGMs. On the other hand, more stringent regulation has compensated this factor.

The three precious metals are used to coat autocatalysts of gasoline engines, while only the former can be used for diesel engines.

The cheaper price of palladium may lure autocat manufacturers like Johnson Matthey and increase their loads of this metal at the expense of platinum. This strategy may narrow the price gap between the two metals and we could see palladium prices at 0.7 to 0.9 of those for platinum.

Rhodium is a byproduct of platinum. Used mostly for autocatalysts, catalysts, and glass manufacturing. DeNOX (gasoline engines). Mined in SA

IRidium is also a byproduct, it's price has sky-rocketed due to its usage in tech gadgets.


These are some insightful comments from SWC's CFO, Greg Wing, about their acquisition of a copper and gold property, and about their view on PGMs, which has been their core area so far.


Hard Assets Investor: Why has copper held its price so well while other industrial metals seem to have taken a hit?

Wing: Well, if you were talking to my boss [CEO] Frank McAllister, he would say that copper is the fifth precious metal. But let me set that aside and say that I think my understanding of it links to the dynamics of the world economy.

If you went back to around 1900 and you looked at the intensity of copper use in the United States, you would see that it was rising very steeply at that point. And that intensity of use, say, per unit of GDP or something like that, was indicative of the fact that the United States was industrializing at that point. Copper demand had grown and was growing very significantly. And, by the way, if you looked at the price of copper in 1910 compared to today in real dollars, it was up around $8 a pound, up substantially from where it is now [about $4 a pound].

In the 1930s, you not only saw the Great Depression, but you also saw the completion of that major industrialization phase in the U.S. The intensity of copper use dropped off in the U.S. It came back, to some extent, during World War II. Following the war, you saw similar spikes in intensity of copper use in Japan and in Germany. That was the rebuilding of those economies.

And then prices fell off somewhere around 1970 and languished from the early 1970s until the early 2000s, about 2003. And all of a sudden, you see another major economy starting to emerge at that point. And that obviously is China, and, to a lesser extent, some other countries. Underlying the strength in the copper price is the fact that China is still very actively industrializing. There is a lot of demand for copper coming out of there.

The demand for copper is exceeding the supply and is probably on trend to do that for a while, or at least is tight against supply. Copper is looking good for the next decade or 15 years, maybe.

HAI: Let’s talk about platinum. What’s driving demand in platinum right now?

Wing: If you look at platinum — and this is true of palladium as well — there aren't very many places in the world where you produce significant quantities of platinum. South Africa produces probably 70 percent. Russia, as a byproduct, produces 20 to 25 percent. And the balance sort of comes out of companies like us. That’s just about it. So, on the supply side, there aren't huge tracts waiting to be developed. The cost curve drives platinum. In South Africa, the marginal producers are right up against the cost curve. On top of that, you’ve got the South African political scene, where people are talking about nationalization. It’s just really tough to make those investment decisions. And then you’ve got limited electricity and limitations on water. In effect, you’ve got platinum pretty well locked against the cost curve.

Obviously, palladium is the principal metal in gasoline catalytic converters. There still is a lot of platinum used in diesel catalytic converters, and a little more than 50 percent of European production is diesel. So that market is there.

The other growing application is in big on-road and off-road diesel applications, both stationary source and construction equipment, over-the-road diesels. So there’s some growth in demand there. And again, platinum supply isn't growing.

HAI: What is the recycling percentage a year of supply?

Wing: It’s probably about 1 million to 1.5 million ounces a year, on top of about 6 million ounces of native production.

HAI: So less than 20 percent?

Wing: That’s right. Others said they can see that going up to 2 to 2.5 million ounces over the next, well, let’s say five to 10 years. Hard to tell, exactly.

HAI: What about palladium?

Wing: Palladium is kind of a parallel story. The big producer, 50 percent or so of the market on palladium production is Norilsk Nickel of Russia. They produce it as a byproduct of nickel. The South Africans produce it as a byproduct of platinum. And obviously we produce it, and North American Palladium produces it, and, to a limited extent, the nickel producers in Canada produce some of it as a byproduct. And again, that’s about it, other than recycling.

The Russian angle to palladium isn’t discussed much. When Norilsk Nickel started large-scale production, which would have been around 1940-41, they also produced palladium as a byproduct. But in those days, there wasn’t really any market for palladium. So they stockpiled it until the fall of the Soviet Union. And estimates, at that point, had about 30 million ounces of palladium sitting in that stockpile.

When the Soviet Union became the Russian Federation and opened up to a freer market structure, the government began gradually selling off that inventory. They never quite said publicly how much is in that inventory. But just kind of working backwards, we’ve estimated that it’s somewhere between 25 and 35 million ounces. Since those sales began, about 30 million ounces have come out. Not much has come out in the last 18 months to two years.

There have been statements by Norilsk and by Russian Finance Ministry officials without attribution that that resource is about gone. The Russian agency that’s responsible for those sales came out earlier this year and said, “We are going to be selling some in 2012 as well.” But they also commented that, to do that, they would be reprocessing to get it up to quality.

Also, China is becoming key to the palladium story. Obviously, at the end of 2008, you saw worldwide auto production fall off fairly steeply. It’s been gradually recovering. In 2010, it was — on a worldwide basis — at record levels: somewhere around 75 million vehicles produced. And the big growth is not in the U.S. or America and Western Europe, it’s China. China is now the largest-producing and the largest-consuming country of vehicles in the world.

HAI: Does China have the same requirements for catalytic converters as the U.S.?

Wing: The requirements are a little bit lighter. But all vehicles produced there have to have catalytic converters. The engines probably, on average, are a little bit smaller. The requirement for platinum and palladium is a little bit lower, and in particular, palladium, because they're mostly gasoline catalytic converters. But again, the projections are that by 2015, we could be producing 100 million vehicles in the world; a one-third increase over where it is today. And obviously, that dynamic suggests that, against limited supply, price is attractive over time. I would quickly add that we think those underlying long-term dynamics are significant. But that’s not to say there won't be cycles in the price superimposed on top of that supply/demand dynamic.

HAI: What do you think of this new catalytic converter that uses gold?

Wing: Well, to the extent that technology is available to study, we’ve looked at it. It looks like it primarily is displacing a certain amount of platinum. At today’s prices, with gold right sort of neck-and-neck with platinum, I'm not sure there’s a whole lot of economic advantage to it. It doesn’t do very much to palladium, at least as we understand it. It’s mostly the platinum that it affects. And the platinum in gasoline catalytic converters is a pretty small component. It would be less than 5 percent.



With the acquisition of the copper and gold property, SWC ceases to be a pure play on PGMs.
Needless to say, the move has not been received cheerfully by the investment community. Here their arguments:

Hard Assets Investor: Why did Stillwater buy Peregrine Metals?

Greg Wing: There are several reasons. We have been concerned about the fact that we are not particularly diversified; that is, we specialize in platinum and palladium. And those are wonderful products to specialize in, but they’re also somewhat cyclical. And if you look back over the last decade or so, there have been about three occasions where the price of palladium, in particular, has cratered.


Elsewhere, platinum production in South Africa is subsidised via lower energy prices (which are even below generation costs).

There are also several macro headwinds
Mr. Savouri mentions several here in his interview in reuters

Toscafund sees South Africa "blow-up" in 15 years
* Consequences more serious than Libya
* Cites emigration, government failure to tackle problems
* Higher commodity prices to benefit Russia, Australia

And here, 'South Africa's election battle vs. markets', by Sid Verma, FT Tilt

Here the 2011 bloomberg ranking of analysts.